The Boogey Man (1980)

Synopsis:

A woman unwittingly releases the murderous spirit of her mother’s lover by shattering the mirror which witnessed his murder 20 years ago.

Review:

“The Boogey Man” (1980) is a relatively unremarkable member of the list of  ‘video nasties’ compiled by the UK Director of Public Prosecutions in the early 1980s.  Ulli Lommel’s shoots this supernatural slasher with atmospheric charm, but its failings are still too many to warrant a glowing reference.

The main positives are the well-executed cinematography and the inventive death sequences. A memorable, if once again unoriginal, musical score adds to the general feel of unease. For me, this uneasy  fervour which pervades much of the film is Lommel’s greatest achievement. I would go further and suggest that the spectral and uncanny demeanour of much of this film is nothing short of artistic.

I also like the premise of the film. The idea of a mirror retaining what it has seen over the years is an interesting one. There is a key difference between the ‘boogey man’ himself and other slashers. This is a supernatural film, more than a ‘dead-teenager’ movie – our slasher is never really seen (at least not after he is murdered in the first reel), he is a malevolent force that can possess individuals and wield pointy objects to key anatomical organs. In essence, you cannot kill him, because you cannot actually see him. In this way, the ‘boogey man’ of Lommel’s world is not a simple imposter for either Michael Myers or Jason.

Nevertheless, the film embezzles rather than borrows from genre milestones such as “The Exorcist” (1973), “Halloween” (1978) and “The Amityville Horror” (1979).  Indeed, the opening is essentially a carbon-copy of Carpenter’s first 5 minutes of “Halloween” (1978) –killer’s POV, kitchen knife wrenched high and all.

Regrettably, thoroughly incomprehensible actions – even by 80s horror movie standards – from our cast are difficult to swallow.  Moreover, the lamentable script could have done with a major rethink. Performances wise, everyone is reasonable although Suzanna Love does give a good turn as a woman haunted by the ghost of her mother’s sadistic dead lover. Grizzled horror veteran John Carradine makes a cameo appearance as a sceptical psychiatrist.

This isn’t a bad movie by the standards of the time, and it looks in places quite gorgeous really, but you won’t be bowled over by it. It remains audibly creepy, even after all these years, and so has to be doing something right. As a result, I have somewhat of a wanton affection for it.

Hotdog rating: 5.5/10

Advertisements

About hotdogcinema

film fan

Posted on June 2, 2013, in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

  1. I have to say I agree, it is the script which completely lets down this film. Such a shame as it had such good potential. Oh well.

    I really like the way you’ve written this review you should have a look at Cayova, they are offering $10,000 sponsorship opportunities for skilled writers like yourself.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: